Marketing representative: "... if my time management is good but my manager's time management is bad, I am still the one who pays the price..."
Associate at an investment bank: "It's a fire drill mentality... The worst thing is the lack of planning... we spend a bunch of time during the day doing nothing or next to nothing... [Then], all of a sudden it is urgent, there is no time even for adequate instructions..."
Associate at a law firm: "...when a partner will know of a deadline days or weeks or even months before it occurs and then doesn't get around to delegating the work until the last minute... an associate has to stay until all hours, maybe around the clock, when there was really no need..."
Most Xers are ready to use our time as a resource to succeed in our careers but we are reluctant to surrender our schedules to managers. We are protective of our time and unwilling to have it controlled and misused.
Managers stuck in the workplace of the past believe they are buying Xers' time and have the right to use it any way they see fit. The problem is that Xers are operating in the workplace of the future. Xers are not selling our time. We are selling our creative output. That is why we deal with managers who try to control our time and then impede our productivity much as a proprietor deals with difficult customers -- with begrudging tolerance.
Xers' most common complaint? Bad planning causes false urgency. Managers hold onto deadlines until the last minute, forcing Xers to wait around all day and run around all night. This reinforces Xers' presumption that we are much better able than our managers to schedule our own time.
Here is the irony: The reason managers fail to make the best use of Xers' time is because they are not managing their own time effectively. Why? When they get caught up in the creative side of their work, some managers forget that they are also supposed to be managing the creative process of their subordinates. They forget the distinction between production time and management time. As a result they fail to allocate management time in their own schedules.
Well, it's a tough job but somebody has to do it. You can't afford to have your time wasted, so you have to play a greater role in scheduling the accomplishment of your work-goals.
First, you have to proactively focus your manager's attention on the end-results for which you will be held responsible. "Exactly what do you want me to produce?" When you start talking in terms of end-results, you remind your manager that you are there to add value, to sell your creative output. You want to demonstrate that it is worthwhile for your manager to spend a small amount of time planning in order to facilitate your productivity.
Second, always insist on deadlines, no matter how small or how large the stated goal of the assignment. If the end-result is too miniscule to justify a deadline, then your manager is not delegating enough responsibility. If the end-result seems too large to set a realistic deadline, then it is not sufficiently concrete.
Seeking deadlines for tangible end-results is not just the mark of someone who can handle responsibility. By insisting on deadlines, you require your manager to clarify the ownership of goals. In doing so, you help map out the terrain in which you can increase your autonomy and gain more control over your schedule.
What happens if your manager interrupts you between goal-setting and deadline? Just go back to the beginning. "Do you have a new goal for me? OK. Let me remind you of goal-number-one and its deadline. Now, does this new goal take priority? If yes, then let's renegotiate the deadline for goal-number-one. If no, then let's set a deadline for the new goal, keeping in mind the deadline for goal-number-one."
By engaging your manager in an ongoing dialogue which revolves around planning deadlines for your achievement of tangible end-results, you create an upward spiral of productivity and autonomy. Who can complain about that?