Get your Tripod T-Shirt

Tripod Home | New | TriTeca | Work/Money | Politics/Community | Living/Travel | Planet T | Daily Scoop


FAQs: Sexuality/Sexual Health


What are the side effects to the fetus if a woman becomes pregnant even after her partner uses a condom with a spermicidal lubricant on it (which has not gone past the expiration date)? In other words, are there any side effects of nonoxynol-9 spermicide on the sperm that still mates with the female egg (like the sperm not being able to carry the genes or the chromosomes due to its reaction to the spermicidal chemical nonoxynol-9)?

In cases of condom and spermicide failure, at least one sperm has overcome overwhelming odds to reach and fertilize the egg. Without the use of contraception, he had one shot in millions to be the lucky suitor. Having outflanked the condom, and swum through a toxic sea of spermicide, what is left of him? Might the spermicide have damaged him to the extent that an abnormal fetus results?

Happily, this does not seem to be the case. Having survived intact enough to reach and penetrate the egg, the sperm seems to have all the components necessary to co-produce a normal, healthy child.

-- R. Jandl, 12/7/96, Category: sexuality & sexual health


I'm a young female who just got married and I am trying to conceive my first child with my husband. I was told to have sex 14 days after the end of my period. Can you tell me if this is true, and when is the best time to conceive?
-- AJ

You are pretty much on target. On the average, women have 28-day menstrual cycles; some a little more, others less. Ovulation occurs approximately mid-cycle, so targeting 14 days is a good idea. (The word "approximately" is important here, as anyone who has tried the rhythm method of contraception can tell you. With the rhythm method, you avoid intercourse for a week or so in the middle of your cycle in order to avoid fertilization. But since it is hard to know exactly when you've ovulated, and since ovulation varies so much, unintended pregnancies commonly result.)

There was an interesting study published in 1995 regarding the timing of conception. They carefully recorded when women had intercourse, and through blood and urine tests, compared that to the timing of ovulation, and then determined whether or not fertilization occurred. They found that women were most likely to conceive (become pregnant) if they had intercourse within a period of six days prior to ovulation. Sex performed six days prior to ovulation could account for about 10 percent of the pregnancies. That success rate rose to a high of about 30 percent when sex was performed on the day of ovulation. If you missed that six day period completely, you were out of luck. One might wonder whether "old sperm" from sex performed several days prior to conception might result in more pregnancy failures, birth defects, or other problems. However, that was not found to be the case. Hardy buggers.

So, it would seem that if you have a 28-day cycle, and if, on the average, you ovulate 14 days after the start of your last menstrual period, then having intercourse between days 8 and 14 would, statistically, maximize the chances of becoming pregnant. Let us know if you have any luck!

-- R. Jandl, 11/11/96, Category: Sexuality and sexual health


I have a question about the pill: On the triphasil pill, when is it truly safe to start having sex without a backup method (assume that you started taking the pill on the very first day of your period)?

Do you have to take the pill at exactly the same time each day, or can you have a range of 1 or 2 hours? (For example, when class schedules dictate that you get up earlier on one day than on another.)

You really need to wait one full menstrual cycle before the pill is effective. The pill works by suppressing ovulation, but the effect is not instantaneous. And since there is not really an accurate way of determining the moment at which ovulation has been safely suppressed, the best practical approach is to wait until you have been through a cycle.

Sometimes, there's a bit of urgency. Maybe you're in a relationship that has suddenly heated up; there may be a sense of impatience, a desire to cut corners and assume that a little bit of the pill in your system is better than none at all. Maybe it's worth a small risk. Well, the magnitude of that risk is not clear. You would be safer to use a condom, or a diaphragm if you have one already fitted and on hand, to tide you over.

As far as timing goes, taking the pill at the same time each day is recommended primarily as a way of getting into a routine, or habit, to lessen the chances of forgetting to take it. The exact time is not important -- could be morning or night. It's a simple thing, but forgetting to take one pill a day is easy to do, and the routine will help you to remember. Missing the time that you normally take the pill by a couple of hours is no problem. If you miss a pill one day, take two the next, and you'll be fine. If you miss two days in a row, take two pills on each of the next two days to catch up, but in this instance it is recommended you abstain or use another contraceptive until you start your next cycle.

-- R. Jandl, 11/4/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


Will masturbation affect your penis at all? I've heard that masturbating as a teenager increases your penis's adult size. Is this true? Does masturbating affect your penis's ability to "shoot" semen at all?

What is the average penis size for a 15 year old?

I was wondering if using an 8" penis could actually "hurt" a petite lady. I have had several women tell me that considering my size, I should "take it easy" so as to not cause any lasting soreness. Please comment.

I'm 18 years old and have a BIG problem. My penis is very small. I'm able to get small erections and masturbate, but I'm afraid that I won't be able to satisfy my girlfriend sexually. Is there some kind of condition that has caused this? And, are there any drugs or medical treatments to make my penis larger?

When it comes to penis size, these questions -- all submitted in the past couple of weeks -- cover the spectrum pretty well. Although the topic is often greeted with laughter, embarrassment, or snickering, I suspect that there are few issues with the potential to cause as much anxiety among men as this one.

Like it or not, a man's sense of masculinity is linked to, perhaps even emanates from, his genital organs. Not a surprise. The genitals are not only a source of great pleasure for a man, but they are often at the heart of his experience of intimacy. They are also the source of hormones that increase his musculature, deepen his voice, distribute his body hair -- all features associated with virility. And the genitals have the "power" to impregnate a woman which is a source of great pride and pleasure for many men.

Does size count? Interestingly, it is not the size of testicles that count, just the penis. It's not hard to see how on some primitive level, size would seem to be important. Throughout history, a man's ability to be "potent" emanates from his erection. All powers of reproduction were dependent on getting an erection. Indeed, power itself was associated with procreation. A king who could not conceive a child -- an heir to the throne -- was in trouble. Most men have experienced at least a temporary failure to maintain an erection well enough to satisfy themselves or their sexual partner. This failure will often leave a man feeling small and inadequate.

So what is a normal penis size? I am going to skirt the issue because it is not the point. Although other men might have you believe (or we may in our minds construct a belief) that one man is better because he is bigger, it is worth challenging that assumption by asking some questions. Does a bigger penis bring a man more sexual pleasure? Does it increase the pleasure of his sexual partner? Does it increase his virility, or enhance his capacity to conceive? Does it make him more desirable as a long term mate? Is his ability to love, to share life, and to be intimate, linked to his penis size? Is his power to excel at work, to be a great athlete, to raise children, to believe in God, to create art, is any of that enhanced by having a large penis? Apart from the width of a man's penis, which in some cases may increase a woman's sexual pleasure, I would suggest that none of these things is dependent on penis size.

So why worry? If you're smaller than others, then you're smaller than others. That will never prevent you from the potential of having thrilling sexual experiences. And if your partner is not satisfied, do not be concerned. There are many reasons why our sexual partners may not be satisfied; but there are also many imaginative ways to provide him or her with ecstatic sexual experiences. A man with a big penis does need to be a little careful of "petite" women. Women's vaginas are also variable in size, in lubrication, and in the potential for discomfort from excessive penetration. Go slow at first, and let her guide you as to what feels comfortable for her. As to whether frequent masturbation can increase penis size or affect ejaculation, I am afraid it will have no effect.

-- R. Jandl, 9/7/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


Assuming a monogamous relationship between two "healthy" people, is there any hazard to swallowing semen during oral sex?

No, there really is not. The substance of the semen itself, which is composed of both fluid from the prostate gland and sperm that was stored in the epididymis, is not harmful in any way.

As you suggest, the only potential worry relates to the transmission of an STD, and the difficulty of knowing for sure whether or not your partner is currently infected. This was discussed in an earlier STD question and may be of some interest.

-- R. Jandl,8/25/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


I am in therapy for being molested as a child. One of the manifestations of this incident is that I have no physical sensations on my breasts and other normally erogenous zones. My question: Is there any physiological explanation for this occurrence? Is there a condition that could cause this without connection to the abuse? My therapist would like to rule out this possibility. Thanks.

Being sexually molested as a child can have a number of painful consequences. The frequency with which men, and to a lesser extent women, sexually abuse children is appalling. Cutting across all socioeconomic barriers, sexual abuse is one of the most damaging of all experiences to the psyche. It may leave scars for life.

One of the consequences of prior sexual abuse is to experience periods of dissociation from one's actual experience. So, for example, a woman who has been sexually abused as a child may be unable to stay in the present moment while making love to her husband. Her mind may go elsewhere. Psychologically, we can imagine that she is having difficulty integrating her current sexual experience (with someone she loves and desires) with painful memories of sexual abuse by another man. The mind is more likely to simply escape, to dissociate from the present experience.

The consequences can be a lack of intimacy or fulfillment in sex, or maybe a lack of libido. This is a sort of mental anesthesia: a protective numbing and forgetting of past experiences. The physical body's sexual responsiveness, being so intimately related to our thoughts and state of mind, may follow suit and become numb.

I am not aware of any medical or neurological entities that could, by themselves, explain a lack of sensation in erogenous areas of the body.

-- R. Jandl, 8/19/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


I recently came to the conclusion that I am bisexual. I am confused about how to have safe sex between two women. And what exactly IS a dental dam?

A dental dam is the latex material a dentist places in your mouth when having dental work done. It is often used during heavier procedures where tooth fragments or blood may be generated. It is impermeable to infectious organisms, even those as small as the HIV virus, and therefore can be used to protect yourself against an STD. Plastic wrap from the grocery store (the heavier stuff) can also be used, as well as a condom that has been cut open longitudinally.

The point, of course, is to provide an impermeable barrier between you and your sexual partner. The trick is how to do it without losing fun, spontaneity, and intimacy. It may take some getting used to. It also may be easier to do if the barrier is used as an expression of caring or love for your partner. You probably wouldn't want to have sex with her if you didn't care about protecting her from inadvertent harm. Sex between two women is statistically much safer than sex between two men, or sex between a man and a woman. But you would be wise not to forget about STDs.

First, with regards to HIV: anytime there is the potential for infected bodily secretions to gain access to your bloodstream, there is the potential for disease transmission. A cut or scrape on your finger, a small sore on your labia, a cold sore or scrape in the mouth -- all can be routes for HIV transmission if infected body fluids come into contact with those areas. In a woman, these body fluids include vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, breast milk, even saliva (although transmission by kissing alone has never been documented). Other STDs such as herpes or genital warts may be transmitted during direct vaginal contact between you and your partner, sometimes even without visible lesions.

So how do you know? You really don't, which is why everyone is being bombarded with the notion of prevention. Until you've been in a longstanding monogamous relationship and feel totally confident that you and your partner are infection-free (this is a very tricky assumption), the use of a barrier during oral sex, or during vaginal-vaginal contact, is a good idea. A latex glove, or fingercot, may be used if your fingers or hands will be exposed to vaginal fluids.

Finally, don't forget that as a bisexual, if you happen not to be using condoms during sex with a man, you may be placing your women partners at greater risk too.

-- R. Jandl, 8/3/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


My husband and I have been trying to start our family for two years now. We just started to chart the Basal Body Temperature (BBT) to find out when I ovulate. Our doctor will take no action until she finds out when and if I was ovulating. We use the home predictor kits with success, but she said they were not as effective as the BBT. Is this true? Anyway, here is my real question: I have discovered, taking my temperature (which usually does seem to run on the "low" side of normal, about 97.6 to 98 on average), seems to be TOO low in the mornings. I use a digital thermometer and it has registered anywhere from 95.6 to 98 in the last few weeks that we have started charting it. It also seems to not follow any sort of pattern. Could there be a medical reason for lower than normal body temperature? And could this affect fertility?
-- MM

Body temperatures vary a great deal. When textbooks talk about a normal body temperature of 98.6 degrees F, that's "normal" in the statistical sense that it is the average body temperature. Around that number there is quite a bit of variation. If your temperature is 97 degrees, or 96 degrees, that is still considered within the normal range. There are medical conditions that lower the body temperature, but it is usually seen only in very sick individuals.

According to Tripod's consulting gynecologist Dr. Susan Yates, a woman's body temperature will go up one-half to one full degree at the time of ovulation, and will stay up until her menstrual flow begins. It is caused by an increase in the amount of circulating progesterone -- one of the hormones required for the menstrual cycle and for maintaining pregnancy. If you are measuring your daily basal body temperature (taken at the same time, first thing in the morning) you should be able to detect the increase in body temperature, but it may take a couple of days before the effect is seen. This can lead to some frustration in terms of trying to time intercourse in order to get pregnant as it may already be too late. However, it is a good way for determining whether or not ovulation is occurring.

The other test you mention is the "home predictor kit." These kits test a urine sample for the presence of a hormone called luteinizing hormone, or LH. LH is produced by an area of the brain called the pituitary gland, and stimulates the ovary to produce estrogen. In the 24 to 48 hours prior to ovulation there will be a surge in the amount of LH, which is detectable by this test. The more expensive tests tend to be more accurate.

The decision as to whether BBT monitoring, the home predictor test, or both are used as part of an initial infertility work-up is a decision best made by you and your gynecologist.

By the way, a low normal body temperature will not cause infertility.

-- R. Jandl,7/25/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


A few months ago, you wrote "With HIV, there are few if any 'mild' infections. The odds of progression to AIDS, and eventually to death, is very high." I always thought HIV always led to AIDS and AIDS was always fatal (eventually). Am I wrong? Thanks.
-- BB

You raise a very important point, and one that is worth thinking about for a moment. The question as to whether or not everyone who is infected with HIV will develop AIDS is not yet answered. Nor is it clear that everyone who develops AIDS will die from it. There is no denying the devastation wrought by AIDS, nor how poor the long-term prognosis. But the average time it takes from infection by HIV to the onset of AIDS symptoms is so long (11 years or more) and since the disease was only recognized in the early 1980's, the possibility remains that some number of AIDS victims will actually survive it. In fact, recent reports from Australia describe a small number of people who have had many years of being HIV positive, but who show no clinical or immunological signs of progression to AIDS. This year has also seen the development of new medications for HIV that in preliminary studies show some real promise. The prognosis of HIV infection is still grim, but there are reasons to be hopeful, and it would not be correct to say that every case is fatal.

The world is still reeling from the onslaught of HIV disease. It may sound harsh, but in the end, AIDS is just a disease like leukemia, cancer, even advanced heart disease, or emphysema. For most people, when they hear of any of these diagnoses, they also hear their death knell. Mortality statistics will tell us that it is just another way to die. But with AIDS, the numbers will add up frighteningly fast as the pandemic unfolds and AIDS exacts its gruesome toll on millions of lives lost around the world.

Millions of people are living with HIV now. And make no mistake, some of them will begin to out-live HIV. It's a matter of precious time. Those who are HIV positive now have reason to hope that sometime during their lifetime the prognosis will begin to improve.

-- R. Jandl,7/10/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


Dear Dr. Bob: I was wondering what the chances are of getting the AIDS virus when performing oral sex on a woman. If there is a risk, what can I do to protect myself? And -- if you kiss a person with herpes can you get the virus in your system? How about if you give oral sex to a person with herpes, can that bring it into your system?

Can you pick up HIV or herpes from oral sex? The simple answer is yes. It is possible. But here are some things to keep in mind.

HIV is present in the semen of men who have AIDS or who are HIV positive. When ejaculate is taken into the mouth, there is the potential for the virus to enter into even normal mucosal cells lining the mouth, resulting in infection. If there is any break in the normal mucosa, whether it is from a cold sore, inflamed gums, cracked lips, or any other lesion, the likelihood of transmission increases. Pre-ejaculate fluid is also technically capable of transmitting infection.

Vaginal fluids of a woman with AIDS, or who is HIV positive, also contain HIV. Therefore, oral sex with a woman can result in transmission of the virus. If any menstrual blood is present in the vaginal fluid, this too can be a route of transmission.

Herpes is a little bit different in that most times an active herpes sore must be present for transmission to occur. Check out a previous herpes question for more information and an important qualifier to this. Although one type of herpes tends to be found in the mouth, and another type in the genitals, the symptoms are indistinguishable. During oral sex, genital herpes may be transmitted to the mouth, and oral herpes may be transmitted to the genitals. It is perfectly safe, however, to kiss a person with active genital herpes on the lips or mouth.

Since neither HIV nor herpes can be cured, the usual advice is to use some type of barrier prevention. With men, using a condom during oral sex protects both parties. You may want to experiment with different styles, colors, flavors, or other different types of condoms, to compensate for the loss of touch or intimacy that might otherwise be experienced. For oral sex with a woman, use of a layer of plastic wrap, or a dental dam, over the vaginal area will provide protection. It does seem a bit sterile or off-putting to use these barriers, but at this time there are not too many other reasonable alternatives.

If the virus is present in semen and vaginal fluid, how likely is transmission during oral sex in the real world? It's impossible to predict. Factors such as where you live, who you hook up with, what you do, and a dozen other variables would have to be considered. The human mind, being uncomfortable with more than a few variables at once, and being driven at times by sexual desire, cannot, and does not want to, think this all through in the heat of the moment. There are many reports of people who have contracted AIDS whose only reported risk factor is receiving oral sex from a man. Could it happen with one encounter? Yes. Does the risk increase with multiple encounters? Possibly. Each encounter can be viewed as a flip of the coin. You either get infected, or you don't. With HIV, there are few if any "mild" infections. The odds of progression to AIDS, and eventually to death, is very high. So it's an all-or-none game.

-- R. Jandl, 5/16/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


Can a doctor tell whether you've had a miscarriage?

No they cannot. According to Dr. Yates, Tripod's ob-gyn consultant, there are no scars or changes detectable after a routine miscarriage or properly performed abortion. A doctor performing a routine pelvic examination will have no idea whether or not you have been previously pregnant.

On the other hand, for a woman who has had a full-term pregnancy and delivered the baby, there may be changes in the appearance of the uterine cervix, scars in the perineum (the area between the vaginal opening and the anus), or stretch marks on the abdomen, that will provide clues to a previous pregnancy.

-- R. Jandl, 4/24/96, Category: sexuality and sexual health


This may be foolish, but is it possible for a doctor to tell if I have had anal sex, just by me receiving a regular physical? I have avoided physicals for some time due to this fear. Thanks for your time.
-- DM

As long as you have no problems with the rectal area, such as pain, bleeding, discharge, or diarrhea, then a physician, or anyone else for that matter, will be unable to tell if you have had anal sex. (Of course, even if you have these symptoms, they may be due to a number of other medical conditions besides anal sex.) If you have experienced some trauma during intercourse, an abrasion or fissure may result, and that would be apparent to someone examining the area. But you would certainly be aware of soreness, or even bleeding from the anus, so it should not come as a surprise. Lubrication, of course, will help to prevent this.

Unhappily, many people do feel threatened or intimidated when they go to the doctor's. Just thinking about it can bring on a cold sweat. That is unfortunate. Why shouldn't a person be able to talk about their sexual preferences? And why should it be so difficult to reveal an aspect of one's sexuality without fear of stigmatization or condemnation? Whatever you reveal about yourself within the confines of a doctor's office should always be held confidential. And keep in mind that doctors routinely see all kinds of different people, lifestyles, and habits. After a while, there aren't too many surprises. Take your time in getting comfortable with a physician. As in any other relationship, trust develops over time.

-- R. Jandl 4/10/96, Category: sexuality/sexual health


For the past 5 years I have had NO sexual desire whatsoever. My husband is as interested as he always was, but we have both gained a great deal of weight. How can I restore these sexual feelings?

You ask an important and difficult question. Sexual desire, as most everyone knows, is influenced by many different things. And it's not hard to have it go wrong. The feelings you have for your mate, the circumstances of your surroundings, feelings about oneself, past experiences with sex, and many other factors may influence your desire.

For starters, I think it is helpful to acknowledge that because of the cultural milieu in most parts of the western world, someone without strong sexual energies may feel like there must be something wrong. This is not necessarily true, although there may be problems working that out with a mate. In addition, if sex with your partner was never very much fun, or didn't give the intimacy desired, or if abuse ever occurred in the past; if sex became routine or boring from lack of imagination, or too focused on getting an orgasm, if work leaves you exhausted, if there is unresolved tension or anger in the relationship, if you have any physical problems of discomfort during sex, or feelings of depression, even side-effects to medicines, these too may have an impact. Being overweight does not necessarily mean a loss of sexual desire, although it certainly could affect your feelings of attraction.

Those of you who are parents may understand how difficult it is to feel uninhibited about sex with children in the house. Then again, how much time is spent seducing our lovers? Are dining, lighting, music, sense of privacy, the physical surroundings, conducive to love-making? Is there talk of love, sharing of feelings, something more than the physical act of sexual play to arouse interest.

We could go on for some time. One suggestion would be to regard a lack of sexual desire not so much as a problem to get rid of, but as an opportunity to learn more about yourself, your relationship with your partner, and your sexual life.

-- R. Jandl, 3/11/96; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


I've been told I may have mono and am in the process of having my blood checked but have been told it may not be positive yet because I haven't been sick long enough. I have a boyfriend and am wondering if I DO have mono, what kind of contact can we continue to have? Because the disease is spread through saliva (the throat), is there any risk in oral/genital contact?

Mono, or infectious mononucleosis, is a viral infection caused by the Epstein Barr virus (EBV), with symptoms that typically include sore throat, fever, enlarged lymph nodes in the neck, and marked fatigue. The disease is known to be very contagious. In fact it has long been known as the "kissing disease" because of it's tendency to be transmitted by kissing. The virus is found in all body fluids, however, and can be transmitted by oral-genital contact.

Fortunately, most people recover without any problem. Many people are exposed and become immune to mono as children, and are thereby protected from getting the disease later in life. The blood test for mono takes five to seven days to turn positive because it measures antibody activity in the infected persons blood which takes a few days to develop. Generally speaking, you can resume intimate contact within a couple of weeks, once the fever is gone and the symptoms are significantly improved.

--R. Durning, 12/8/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


Is masturbating good for you?

For many people masturbation is an enjoyable way of playing out sexual fantasies, releasing sexual tension, and becoming more comfortable with their own sexuality. For some people, masturbation is a part of the enjoyment of sex when shared with their partner(s). For others, it may help curb impulses to have sex with someone that might later be regretted.

These aspects of masturbation may be good for your health psychologically and emotionally (and certainly it is healthy to be free of guilt or fear just because you masturbate). But there are otherwise no physical benefits to your health from masturbation.

-- R. Jandl, 10/11/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


I've recently started a relationship with an AIDS-free woman and we would like to have sex without a condom. I've forgotten everything I learned in freshmen health class about a woman's period and pregnancy risk. Can a women get pregnant while she has her period? How many days after her period ends can we have unprotected sex without fear of pregnancy.
-- KW

A woman ovulates 14 days prior to when her period begins. Therefore, her most fertile time of the cycle is a few days before and after ovulation. The difficulty with using rhythm or calendar methods of contraception is that any woman can vary from month to month in the timing between onset of the period and when she next ovulates. This is why women's menstral cycles can vary from between 21 and 40 days, or more. A woman with a 21-day cycle will be fertile during her period, and a woman with a 42-day cycle will be fertile one month after her period began.

Therefore, I would advise always using a contraceptive. Unless you can be absolutely sure that you are, and will be, in a monogamous relationship, I would advise using a condom along with a contraceptive cream, foam or suppository in the woman's vagina. Using a Nonoxyl-9 containing spermicide with the condom significantly reduces the risk of pregnancy in case of condom leakage, breakage, or slippage. Remember that AIDS is not the only sexually transmitted disease, and that condom use protects against transmission of all STD's.

-- S. Yates, 11/27/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


I'm 28 and have been on the pill for 12 years. We are thinking about having children in the next two years. Some say I should be completely off the pill for six months before trying. Others said it doesn't matter, I can get off the pill and get pregnant right away. Who is right?

Contrary to your friend's advise, it is not necessary to be off the pill for an extended period of time before attempting pregnancy. There is no increased risk of birth defects or other problems if you concieve right after stopping the pill. I usually advise allowing one normal period after discontinuing the pill, to allow your menstral cycle to return to its usual pattern, and then try for pregnancy. This makes it easier to know when your fertile time is in the cycle, and makes for more accruate calculation of your due date when pregnant. Good luck!

-- S. Yates 11/14/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


I am interested in a man who has had a vasectomy. It is too early to discuss the children thing, but I am wondering what the possibility of a reversal is. He is 44 and in good health. He had the operation between 10 and 12 years ago.

Once several years have past since a vasectomy, the chances of being able to conceive by surgically re-connecting the tube that carries the sperm from the testicles is minimal. From a surgical point of view it is technically feasible, but after the duct has been blocked for so long, the testicles simply stop producing sperm in sufficient numbers to be able to conceive.

However, in the past couple of years, progress has been made with a procedure called intracytoplasmic sperm injection ("ICSI") done in some fertility clinics. In this procedure, sperm can be aspirated by needle, or by obtaining a piece of sperm-producing tissue, and in the laboratory, one sperm is injected into one egg which is then implanted in the mother. This technique, while expensive, could be considered. Keep in mind that it is no where near 100 percent successful, but it can be repeated if necessary.

-- R. Jandl, 10/10/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


Could you descibe any side effects that could result from using an IUD?

The IUD, or intrauterine device, is a small object made in a variety of shapes and materials, which is inserted into a woman's uterus in order to prevent pregnancy. It is believed to work by causing an inflammatory reaction of the uterine lining and thereby preventing implantation of the egg. Through the many years (well over 20) of its existence, the IUD has been widely used and accepted as a viable method of contraception with an efficacy of 97 - 98%, but there are a few risks associated with its use.

At the time of insertion, there is a risk of developing pelvic inflammatory disease (a serious infection involving the female reproductive system). This risk remains present after insertion but diminishes significantly after the initial procedure. Studies are underway now to assess the possible association of IUDs with increased risk of HIV transmission, but there are no definite answers available yet.

A significant number of women experience increased menstrual pain with an IUD in place. About 10 - 15% will have their IUD removed due to symptoms associated with abnormal bleeding.

Pregnancy and IUDs do not mix well. If an accidental pregnancy does occur with an IUD present, approximately 50% of otherwise normal pregnancies will end in miscarriage. In addition, five percent of women who become pregnant with an IUD in place will have an ectopic ( tubal) pregnancy.

It is important to keep in mind that an IUD does offer effective protection against getting pregnant, but it offers no protection against sexually transmitted diseases.

-- C. Ebelke, 9/27/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


Last month I started taking the pill. But I just read recently that the pill increases my chances of having a stroke. This scares me, what should I do?

Generally considered very safe and effective, oral contraceptives (birth control pills) contain hormones that suppress ovulation. Like any other drug, these hormones have the potential for side-effects ranging from weight gain and breast tenderness, to more serious problems related to blood clotting such as stroke, phlebitis, or heart attacks. Fortunately, the incidence of many of these side-effects have been reduced over the years through the use of lower doses of estrogens. Most women today take no more than 35 ug of estrogen per day, compared to 50 ug two decades ago when studies showed increased risks for these events. Consequently, your healthcare provider will usually prescribe the lowest dose of estrogen that will work to keep you from becoming pregnant. Today, unless there are other medical conditions present, most doctors believe that there is little increase in blood clotting problems among young, nonsmoking women who use the pill.

There are subgroups of women who tend to have higher risks for clotting problems. They are smokers, women over the age of 35 or 40, and women who have been on the pill for many years (e.g. 10 or more).

The pill is about the most effective form of contraception, short of abstinence. But remember that you are putting additional hormones into your body. When considering going on the pill, be sure you have carefully discussed your personal health risks with your healthcare provider, and have all your questions answered.

-- R. Jandl; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


Can AIDS/HIV be transmitted via breast milk?

Yes, HIV/AIDS can be spread by breast milk.

In fact, the virus can potentially be spread by any bodily fluid, but the concentration of the virus is highest in blood. This makes blood more infectious than say tears or saliva which have much, much lower concentrations of the virus. In practice, the infectivity of tears or saliva is very low. Casual contact with these fluids does not lead to transmission except in unusual circumstances (e.g., kissing someone with AIDS who has a very high amount of virus in their body, when you have an open sore in your mouth or lips.)

In general, the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta has recommended that persons infected with HIV be advised that they should:

  • Refrain from donating blood, semen, body organs, or other tissue
  • Refrain from sharing needles or syringes with anyone
  • Refrain from breast-feeding infants
  • Consider the use of latex condoms to prevent sexual transmission
  • Share the information with their physician

    Partners of HIV positive persons may wish to be tested for the virus. If they are positive, then no further recommendations are indicated. If they are negative, then "safe-sex" habits including use of condoms, dental dams, and avoidance of blood exposure should be practiced.

    Infants of HIV positive mothers should be identified, hopefully before birth, because treatment with AZT can lower the transmission rate to these newborn children, and avoidance of breast-feeding will also help prevent transmission of the virus to newborn infants.

    -- A. Calhoun, 2/4/96; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    A contraceptive "failure" rate of ~12% per year has been cited for couples using condoms alone. For this reason, use of an additional method (spermicide, diaphragm, etc.) has been recommended in addition to condoms. Is there evidence that condoms which are lubricated with spermicide are any better at preventing pregnancy than condoms which are not? Is the use of a back-up method still recommended/necessary?
    -- JE

    The contraceptive failure rate for condoms that you quoted is consistent with what we know. And it is true that when a spermicidal foam or jelly is used for lubrication (as opposed to a simple lubricant such as K-Y Jelly and others) that the risk of pregnancy is even less. Some data suggest the contraceptive effectiveness rises to about 96% when both are used.

    In addition, there is some evidence that contraceptive foams or jellies may also reduce the transmission of infectious organisms such as HIV, chlamydia, herpes simplex, and possibly the human papillomavirus (the cause of venereal warts). This is an unintended (and unreliable) but fortunate benefit.

    If condoms are your main source of contraception, the addition of spermicidal foam or jelly will decrease your risk of unintended pregnancy.

    -- R. Jandl, 1/9/96; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    Once you have had unprotected sex with someone, is there any point in using condoms with that person later? I mean for the purposes of avoiding transmitting AIDS, I'm on the pill, so I'm not really worried about getting pregnant.

    I would advise using condoms in future contacts, even if you have had sex without a condom before with that person. You will not always be infected with the AIDS virus every time you have unprotected sexual exposure. The more times you have contact with the virus, the more likely you are to be infected by it. So getting away with it once, does not necessarily mean getting away with it a second time.

    If you are considering getting tested for exposure to the AIDS virus, remember that it may take up to six months for your blood test to become positive after exposure. Therefore if you had exposure to the virus today, you might not have a positive test until six months from now.

    You also point out one of the drawbacks to using the pill -- it's a great contraceptive, but it does not protect you against STD's.

    -- S. Yates, 1/2/96; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    I have a few questions about HIV. Why is it that you have to wait for three month after you have intercourse with somebody to be tested? I had sex about two months ago with a person who I do not really know much about and I am a little scared of HIV and AIDS. I did use a condom but I don't know. One more question, if you are HIV positive, does that mean you will die soon?

    At first, after the HIV virus has entered your body, you will test negative for HIV. That is because the standard screening blood test detects antibodies you make to fight off the HIV infection, and not the HIV virus itself. Those antibodies take a while to form, and when they do, it is called "seroconversion." In the case of HIV, we need to wait approximately six months after your last contact with HIV to see if you have seroconverted. Ninety-nine percent of people who are going to convert will do so by then. Many people will convert sooner (up to 95% at three months). To be able to confidently reassure someone that they did not pick up HIV it is best to wait the six months, although there may be situations where testing at both three and six months make sense.

    It's great you used a condom. If you have any questions about using them correctly check out Contraception Contemplation. Prevention of AIDS is only possible by preventing HIV transmission.

    Your last question is a difficult one. For someone who is infected with the HIV virus, they can often look forward to many years of good health. As you know, that can change with time, and there is still no cure for the disease. However, there have been small numbers of people reported who have "beat the odds." By living much longer than expected, these people may ultimately help show the way to long-term survival.

    -- R. Jandl, 12/15/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    What is the maximum length of time HIV can remain infectious in a bodily fluid which has been deposited on a surface (like a floor or table or whatever)?
    -- RI

    When left on an open surface, HIV actually remains infectious for a relatively short period of time. In most cases, the virus is no longer viable after a couple of hours. Transmission from such a surface (be it a toilet seat, counter-top, bed sheets, etc.) would also require movement of the virus through either a mucous membrane (such as the eye or mouth) or a break in the skin of any kind. Therefore, except in very unusual circumstances, you will not catch HIV from casual contact with public toilets, counter tops, or other such surfaces.

    Be aware, however, that materials or secretions that are newly contaminated with the virus may be more or less transmissable depending on the concentration of the virus, and how much of an exposure occurs. For example, fresh semen containing the HIV virus, when rubbed on fingers with no rashes or breaks in the skin does not seem to be a problem; whereas if the finger touches and heavily contaminates the eye, or if the finger has a cut or open abrasion, and especially if the semen was contaminated with high concentrations of HIV, transmission is possible.

    -- R. Jandl, 11/21/95; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    My boyfriend says he once had an attack of genital herpes, but that I don't have to worry about catching it if he has no sores at the time we have sex. Is he right?

    Not exactly. Genital herpes (usually caused by the virus herpes simplex type) is transmitted through vaginal and anal intercourse. Most frequently, there are multiple painful or burning sores involving the vagina, labia, vulva, or rectum in women, and the penis, rectum, or area at the base of the penis in men. The sores will go away, but as the virus remains dormant in your body, sores may reappear months or years later. If you or your partner have herpes sores at the time of sexual contact it is very contagious.

    Unfortunately, genital herpes is not curable. Therefore, once you've had an initial outbreak, there is the possibility of transmitting the disease. This is true even if you have no visible sores. The reason for this is that a carrier of herpes begins to shed the virus (meaning you're contagious) just before an outbreak occurs -- in other words, while you feel fine, or when you first begin to feel a burning or itching sensation, and before there are any visible sores. The frequency with which you can get herpes from someone who has the virus and is completely asymptomatic is not known, but probably relatively low.

    The best thing to do is to always use a condom, and if sores are present, avoid sex altogether. Remember that just the physical contact between the vulva and the base of the penis while using a condom can transmit herpes. The Reality female condom protects those areas somewhat better.

    -- R. Jandl; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    I noticed some small bumps on my penis. Could these be genital warts? If so do I need to do anything about them?

    Genital warts are also known as venereal warts, or condyloma acuminatum. They are a type of wart that look like those found anywhere else on the body, but that only occur in the genital area. They are caused by a virus, and transmitted by direct "skin-to-skin" sexual contact. Once acquired, the virus cannot be cured, but the warts themselves come and go. They typically affect the areas of the vulva, vagina, rectum, and cervix in women, and the penis, scrotum, and rectum in men. You should see a health professional to determine whether your bumps are warts, or something else.

    By and large, genital warts are considered more of a nuisance than a major health problem. Nonetheless, there is evidence that the virus increases a woman's risk for cervical cancer. Women should take extra care to obtain annual pap smears for cervical cancer screening.

    There are a variety of local treatments that will remove the warts, but as with any other wart, the virus remains in your body. These treatments are available from gynecologists, dermatologists, and some primary care practitioners. Do not use over-the-counter remedies for these types of warts.

    Removal of the warts, and the use of condoms, will reduce your chances of giving genital warts to an uninfected person, but are not fool-proof as small, barely perceptible warts on genital areas not shielded by the condom, could potentially transmit the virus.

    -- R. Jandl; Category: Sexuality/Sexual Health


    Tripod Home | New | TriTeca | Work/Money | Politics/Community | Living/Travel | Planet T | Daily Scoop

    Map | Search | Help | Send Us Comments